日本フィジカルAI新聞

世界のフィジカルAIを、日本語で。

軌跡予測arXiv:2210.08009

Seq2Seq RNNによる交差点での車両軌跡予測と衝突識別

Trajectory Prediction for Vehicle Conflict Identification at Intersections Using Sequence-to-Sequence Recurrent Neural Networks

シェア:XThreadsFacebookLINEはてブBluesky

交差点での車両の将来軌跡をSeq2Seq RNNで最大3秒先まで予測し、車両の位置と向きからバウンディングボックスを推定して衝突指標を算出する手法を提案した。

著者: Amr Abdelraouf, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Zijin Wang, Ou Zheng

分類: cs.AI, cs.RO

原文アブストラクト

Surrogate safety measures in the form of conflict indicators are indispensable components of the proactive traffic safety toolbox. Conflict indicators can be classified into past-trajectory-based conflicts and predicted-trajectory-based conflicts. While the calculation of the former class of conflicts is deterministic and unambiguous, the latter category is computed using predicted vehicle trajectories and is thus more stochastic. Consequently, the accuracy of prediction-based conflicts is contingent on the accuracy of the utilized trajectory prediction algorithm. Trajectory prediction can be a challenging task, particularly at intersections where vehicle maneuvers are diverse. Furthermore, due to limitations relating to the road user trajectory extraction pipelines, accurate geometric representation of vehicles during conflict analysis is a challenging task. Misrepresented geometries distort the real distances between vehicles under observation. In this research, a prediction-based conflict identification methodology was proposed. A sequence-to-sequence Recurrent Neural Network was developed to sequentially predict future vehicle trajectories for up to 3 seconds ahead. Furthermore, the proposed network was trained using the CitySim Dataset to forecast both future vehicle positions and headings to facilitate the prediction of future bounding boxes, thus maintaining accurate vehicle geometric representations. It was experimentally determined that the proposed method outperformed frequently used trajectory prediction models for conflict analysis at intersections. A comparison between Time-to-Collision (TTC) conflict identification using vehicle bounding boxes versus the commonly used vehicle center points for geometric representation was conducted. Compared to the bounding box method, the center point approach often failed to identify TTC conflicts or underestimated their severity.

関連論文

  1. 1Boston Dynamics、車輪付きAtlasの研究試作機を紹介研究・技術
  2. 2GXOとApptronik、Apolloの物流現場試験を拡大 最大1,000台の展開を構想量産・展開
  3. 3newmoとKDDIが資本業務提携 2028年に堺市で自動運転タクシー商用化目指す提携・買収
  4. 4NVIDIA、CoRLでGR00T 2とIsaac Lab 3.0を発表新製品・発表
  5. 5UC BerkeleyとNVIDIAの研究者、AIエージェントでロボット制御コードを仮想環境で改善研究・技術

PR・アフィリエイト広告

OZ GAMING(GPU搭載BTOゲーミングPC)

OZ GAMING(GPU搭載BTOゲーミングPC)の公式広告バナーOZ GAMINGで完成品PCを見る ↗
PR本紙発行元 EmplifAI