日本フィジカルAI新聞

世界のフィジカルAIを、日本語で。

物理推論ベンチマークarXiv:2306.15668

Physion++:物体の潜在的な物理特性のオンライン推論を必要とする物理的シーン理解の評価

Physion++: Evaluating Physical Scene Understanding that Requires Online Inference of Different Physical Properties

シェア:XThreadsFacebookLINEはてブBluesky

物体の質量・摩擦・弾性・変形性といった直接観測できない潜在的な物理特性を、動きや相互作用から推論できるかを評価する新しいデータセットとベンチマークPhysion++を提案し、最先端の予測モデルと人間の予測性能を比較した。

著者: Hsiao-Yu Tung, Mingyu Ding, Zhenfang Chen, Daniel Bear, Chuang Gan, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Daniel LK Yamins, Judith E Fan, Kevin A. Smith

分類: cs.CV, cs.AI, cs.GR, cs.RO

原文アブストラクト

General physical scene understanding requires more than simply localizing and recognizing objects -- it requires knowledge that objects can have different latent properties (e.g., mass or elasticity), and that those properties affect the outcome of physical events. While there has been great progress in physical and video prediction models in recent years, benchmarks to test their performance typically do not require an understanding that objects have individual physical properties, or at best test only those properties that are directly observable (e.g., size or color). This work proposes a novel dataset and benchmark, termed Physion++, that rigorously evaluates visual physical prediction in artificial systems under circumstances where those predictions rely on accurate estimates of the latent physical properties of objects in the scene. Specifically, we test scenarios where accurate prediction relies on estimates of properties such as mass, friction, elasticity, and deformability, and where the values of those properties can only be inferred by observing how objects move and interact with other objects or fluids. We evaluate the performance of a number of state-of-the-art prediction models that span a variety of levels of learning vs. built-in knowledge, and compare that performance to a set of human predictions. We find that models that have been trained using standard regimes and datasets do not spontaneously learn to make inferences about latent properties, but also that models that encode objectness and physical states tend to make better predictions. However, there is still a huge gap between all models and human performance, and all models' predictions correlate poorly with those made by humans, suggesting that no state-of-the-art model is learning to make physical predictions in a human-like way. Project page: https://dingmyu.github.io/physion_v2/

関連論文

  1. 1Boston Dynamics、車輪付きAtlasの研究試作機を紹介研究・技術
  2. 2GXOとApptronik、Apolloの物流現場試験を拡大 最大1,000台の展開を構想量産・展開
  3. 3newmoとKDDIが資本業務提携 2028年に堺市で自動運転タクシー商用化目指す提携・買収
  4. 4NVIDIA、CoRLでGR00T 2とIsaac Lab 3.0を発表新製品・発表
  5. 5UC BerkeleyとNVIDIAの研究者、AIエージェントでロボット制御コードを仮想環境で改善研究・技術

PR・アフィリエイト広告

FRONTIER(GPU搭載BTOパソコン)

FRONTIER(GPU搭載BTOパソコン)の公式広告バナーFRONTIERでGPU搭載PCを見る ↗
PR本紙発行元 EmplifAI