日本フィジカルAI新聞

世界のフィジカルAIを、日本語で。

マルチエージェント経路計画arXiv:2405.17794

LNS2+RL: マルチエージェント強化学習と大近傍探索を組み合わせたマルチエージェント経路計画

LNS2+RL: Combining Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Large Neighborhood Search in Multi-Agent Path Finding

シェア:XThreadsFacebookLINEはてブBluesky

マルチエージェント経路計画において、強化学習による協調的な再計画と優先度付き計画法を組み合わせ、衝突解消の品質と計算効率のバランスを取る手法を提案。

著者: Yutong Wang, Tanishq Duhan, Jiaoyang Li, Guillaume Sartoretti

分類: cs.RO

原文アブストラクト

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a critical component of logistics and warehouse management, which focuses on planning collision-free paths for a team of robots in a known environment. Recent work introduced a novel MAPF approach, LNS2, which proposed to repair a quickly obtained set of infeasible paths via iterative replanning, by relying on a fast, yet lower-quality, prioritized planning (PP) algorithm. At the same time, there has been a recent push for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) based MAPF algorithms, which exhibit improved cooperation over such PP algorithms, although inevitably remaining slower. In this paper, we introduce a new MAPF algorithm, LNS2+RL, which combines the distinct yet complementary characteristics of LNS2 and MARL to effectively balance their individual limitations and get the best from both worlds. During early iterations, LNS2+RL relies on MARL for low-level replanning, which we show eliminates collisions much more than a PP algorithm. There, our MARL-based planner allows agents to reason about past and future information to gradually learn cooperative decision-making through a finely designed curriculum learning. At later stages of planning, LNS2+RL adaptively switches to PP algorithm to quickly resolve the remaining collisions, naturally trading off solution quality (number of collisions in the solution) and computational efficiency. Our comprehensive experiments on high-agent-density tasks across various team sizes, world sizes, and map structures consistently demonstrate the superior performance of LNS2+RL compared to many MAPF algorithms, including LNS2, LaCAM, EECBS, and SCRIMP. In maps with complex structures, the advantages of LNS2+RL are particularly pronounced, with LNS2+RL achieving a success rate of over 50% in nearly half of the tested tasks, while that of LaCAM, EECBS and SCRIMP falls to 0%.

関連論文

  1. 1Boston Dynamics、車輪付きAtlasの研究試作機を紹介研究・技術
  2. 2GXOとApptronik、Apolloの物流現場試験を拡大 最大1,000台の展開を構想量産・展開
  3. 3newmoとKDDIが資本業務提携 2028年に堺市で自動運転タクシー商用化目指す提携・買収
  4. 4NVIDIA、CoRLでGR00T 2とIsaac Lab 3.0を発表新製品・発表
  5. 5UC BerkeleyとNVIDIAの研究者、AIエージェントでロボット制御コードを仮想環境で改善研究・技術

PR・アフィリエイト広告

MINISFORUM(ミニPC)

MINISFORUM(ミニPC)の公式広告バナーMINISFORUM公式ストアを見る ↗
PR本紙発行元 EmplifAI