データ駆動型予測制御における非ホロノミックロボットの双線形Koopman実現:データは幾何学を置き換えない
Data-Driven Predictive Control of Nonholonomic Robots Based on a Bilinear Koopman Realization: Data Does Not Replace Geometry
非ホロノミック移動ロボットの予測制御にEDMD(拡張動的モード分解)を統合し、実世界データのみから高精度な制御器を構築できることをシミュレーションと実機実験で示した。ただし、データ駆動アプローチが従来の幾何学的モデリングを完全に代替するものではないことを明らかにした。
著者: Mario Rosenfelder, Lea Bold, Hannes Eschmann, Peter Eberhard, Karl Worthmann, Henrik Ebel
分類: eess.SY, cs.LG, cs.RO, cs.SY
原文アブストラクト
Advances in machine learning and the growing trend towards effortless data generation in real-world systems has led to an increasing interest for data-inferred models and data-based control in robotics. It seems appealing to govern robots solely based on data, bypassing the traditional, more elaborate pipeline of system modeling through first-principles and subsequent controller design. One promising data-driven approach is the Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition (EDMD) for control-affine systems, a system class which contains many vehicles and machines of immense practical importance including, e.g., typical wheeled mobile robots. EDMD can be highly data-efficient, computationally inexpensive, can deal with nonlinear dynamics as prevalent in robotics and mechanics, and has a sound theoretical foundation rooted in Koopman theory. On this background, this present paper examines how EDMD models can be integrated into predictive controllers for nonholonomic mobile robots. In addition to the conventional kinematic mobile robot, we also cover the complete data-driven control pipeline - from data acquisition to control design - when the robot is not treated in terms of first-order kinematics but in a second-order manner, allowing to account for actuator dynamics. Using only real-world measurement data, it is shown in both simulations and hardware experiments that the surrogate models enable high-precision predictive controllers in the studied cases. However, the findings raise significant concerns about purely data-centric approaches that overlook the underlying geometry of nonholonomic systems, showing that, for nonholonomic systems, some geometric insight seems necessary and cannot be easily compensated for with large amounts of data.
