Adaptive-WAM: 中間ビデオ拡散特徴からの品質誘導型早期終了計画
Adaptive-WAM: Quality-Guided Early-Exit Planning from Intermediate Video-Diffusion Features
ビデオ拡散モデルの全層を実行せず、中間層から軌道をデコードし、品質スコアに基づいて推論を早期終了する適応型プランナーを提案した。
詳しい要約
1. どんなもの？
2. 先行研究と比べてどこがすごい？
3. 技術・手法の肝は？
4. どうやって有効だと検証した？
5. 議論はある？
6. 次に読むべき論文は？
※ AIが要旨から生成した要約です。正確性は原文をご確認ください。
著者: Sining Ang, Yuguang Yang, Yan Wang
分類: cs.RO
原文アブストラクト
Large video diffusion models provide rich spatiotemporal priors for autonomous driving, but existing world-action models often inherit the cost of iterative future-video generation even though deployment only requires an ego trajectory. We ask a more basic question: how much of a video diffusion model must be executed to make a reliable driving decision? Through a controlled study of video denoising timesteps and Diffusion Transformer (DiT) depth, we find that planning performance is largely insensitive to the tested video-noise levels, whereas strong trajectories can already be decoded from intermediate layers. Based on this observation, we introduce Adaptive-WAM, a quality-aware multi-exit planner built on a Wan2.2-5B backbone. Trajectory diffusion heads are attached to selected DiT blocks, and a lightweight trajectory-quality scorer terminates inference once the best trajectory decoded so far satisfies a quality threshold; otherwise, computation continues from the cached hidden state to a deeper exit. The deployed planner therefore avoids the iterative classifier-free denoising loop and VAE decoding required for future-video synthesis, while dynamically allocating backbone depth according to trajectory quality. On NAVSIM, the adaptive single-trajectory planner achieves 90.8 PDMS; a separate fixed-exit variant reaches 92.6 PDMS with 64 proposals. It further obtains 89.9 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2, yielding the best reported results among the compared front-view video world-model planners. Without target-domain fine-tuning, Adaptive-WAM transfers to nuScenes with 0.88 m average L2 error and a 0.08\% collision rate. On an A100, adaptive routing improves PDMS from 90.62 to 90.79 while averaging 170 ms end-to-end planning latency, approximately 10\% below the 190 ms fixed block-15 planner and 47\% below the 320 ms fixed full-depth planner. Code will be released.
